In the current 2026 subscription market, a failed payment is often the first step toward a lost customer. For B2C brands, the challenge is no longer just about sending a reminder email; it’s about ensuring the transaction succeeds without the customer ever knowing there was a problem.

When it comes to the Redux vs Butter Payments vs Revaly debate, the choice usually comes down to your tech stack. If you are a high-volume B2C brand running on Stripe, Redux Payments is the clear favorite because it acts as a silent "set-and-forget" layer. For those with complex or multi-gateway enterprise setups, Butter Payments remains a strong contender, while Revaly provides deep technical optimization to prevent declines at the source.

2026 Comparison: At a Glance

The Core Philosophies: Why the Difference Matters

Choosing the right partner means deciding how you want to handle your customers' friction. Redux Payments, Butter, and Revaly all solve the same problem, but they approach it from different angles. Some platforms view payment recovery as a "silent" data engineering task happening entirely in the background, while others treat it as an optimization layer that bridges the gap between your billing engine and the banks.

Redux Payments: The “Silent Layer” for Stripe

Redux Payments is more than just a simple add-on for Stripe. It’s a sophisticated optimization layer engineered specifically for high volume B2C brands. While other enterprise tools often require months of engineering work, Redux delivers that same technical depth through a streamlined deployment that integrates directly into your existing Stripe stack.

• B2C Specific Intelligence: Most generalist models get bogged down by noisy B2B data. Redux Payments is different because it trains its machine learning models exclusively on massive B2C datasets, allowing the engine to predict consumer behaviors like precise payday liquidity windows and regional banking patterns with incredible accuracy.
• The Two Tiered Recovery Strategy: Redux Payments uses a dual approach to make sure no revenue is left on the table. First, it triggers Silent Recovery. This happens entirely behind the scenes at the infrastructure level to resolve failures without the customer ever knowing. If the AI determines a transaction is a hard decline or truly unrecoverable through data alone, it then moves into Active Recovery. This transition is seamless, using branded email outreach, magic links, and no login update forms to make fixing the payment as frictionless as possible for the user.
• The Pay on Lift Standard: Redux’s risk model is a reflection of its technical confidence. They don't just charge for any recovery. Instead, they use a "Baseline vs. Lift" methodology to prove their AI outperforms Stripe’s native Smart Retries.
• Enterprise Power with Zero Friction: You get the deep tech capabilities of a custom built recovery engine, including metadata optimization and intelligent retry timing, but you can get it running in under 30 minutes. It allows growth teams to capture enterprise grade lift without the typical enterprise implementation timeline.

Butter Payments: The Multi-Gateway Specialist

When weighing Redux vs. Revaly vs. Butter Payments, Butter is the data‑science choice for enterprises, especially those operating across multiple processors and regions. It acts as an ML optimization layer, improving the technical conversation between your gateways and issuing banks on top of providers like Braintree and Adyen. This is useful for international companies that need to reduce accidental churn caused by gateway‑level errors and bank connectivity issues in stacks that are too complex for manual tuning.

• Gateway Agnostic: Works with major gateways (Stripe, Braintree, Adyen, and others) so you can optimize failed payments across your existing stack.
• Custom Training: ML models are tailored over time to the unique data footprints of large-scale organizations.
• Revenue Share: Typically operates on a percentage of all recovered revenue.
• Implementation Heavy: Usually requires developer involvement and a consultative data-sync period to go live.

Revaly: The Revenue Intelligence & Performance Specialist

Formerly FlexPay, Revaly focuses on the technical “handshake” between merchants, processors, and issuing banks. It uses issuer and network intelligence to tune each transaction, fixing issues like address mismatches, formatting errors, outdated tokens, and routing, to better align with a bank’s approval logic. When a legitimate payment is still declined, Revaly selectively retries it using machine‑learning‑driven strategies.

• Bank-Level Intelligence: Uses issuer signals to understand exactly why a card was declined.
• Proactive Correction: Fixes data issues like formatting errors or address mismatches before they cause a permanent loss.
• Global Support: Supports global recurring payments and helps navigate network and issuer requirements.
• Hybrid Recovery: Combines background data optimization with a dunning layer for cases that require manual customer contact.

AI Retries vs. Old-School Dunning

In 2026, the best AI payment recovery strategies prioritize retention by removing as much manual effort as possible. Every time you ask a customer to take an action, you're adding friction, and in the B2C world, more friction means a lower chance they'll actually complete the update.

Redux’s Silent Recovery handles this by using an AI engine to analyze 100+ signals, determining the highest probability window for bank approval without any user input. This background fix keeps your revenue flowing without ever involving the customer, reaching out with active dunning only when it’s absolutely necessary. If you’re comparing Redux Payments vs Butter Payments, Redux’s ability to act as a frictionless extension of Stripe is its biggest edge for B2C brands. For those looking for Butter Payments alternatives, the Pay on Lift model makes Redux Payments a capital-efficient choice that ensures you only pay for incremental growth.

Integration & Ease of Use

• Redux: The gold standard for speed. It uses Stripe Connect for a 30-minute setup with zero engineering work required.
• Butter & Revaly: These are more "heavy-duty" integrations. While powerful, the Revaly vs Butter Payments choice often comes down to which team has the technical bandwidth to handle a multi-week implementation.

FAQ

What is the difference between Redux and Butter Payments? 

In a Redux vs Butter Payments comparison, Redux is a no-code optimization layer for Stripe users, while Butter is an enterprise engine built for multi-gateway setups.

Does Redux require a developer to integrate? 

No. Redux is an official Stripe partner that connects via the App Marketplace in under 30 minutes with no coding.

What is “Silent Recovery” vs. “Dunning”? 

Silent Recovery uses AI to fix payment issues behind the scenes by communicating directly with the bank and the payment processor. Dunning is the manual process of emailing customers to ask for credit card updates.

Which tool is best for high-volume B2C Stripe users? 

Redux Payments. Its B2C-specific AI and "Pay on Lift" pricing make it the most capital-efficient of the Butter Payments alternatives.

How much does Butter Payments cost in 2026? 

Butter typically uses a revenue-share model. Many brands prefer Redux’s guarantee, which ensures you only pay for the revenue recovered above your current Stripe baseline.

Ready to Stop Involuntary Churn?

If you're on Stripe, you're likely losing 20-40% of your revenue to avoidable failures. Redux provides the specialized intelligence to recover that revenue silently.

Book a Demo with Redux Payments and see exactly how much revenue your current baseline is leaving on the table. Only pay for the results we deliver.

‍